Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-16: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - IPR: so we have a late IPR declaration that sys RAND+royalty but yet the filing refers to the I-D that preceded the application and there's a common author/inventor. Sheesh. But the WG did consider it and were ok going ahead from a look at the list. (So there's no need to reply to my whining here:-) - 6.3: Is RFC7739 worth a mention here? Not sure myself. - section 9: I'd have thought that this solution reduced the potential for a DoS compared to the previous situation where multicast traffic is mapped to unicast? If so, worth a mention? _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
