Hi Jordi,

Thanks for that. Will fix in the next update.

Regards,
Ian

> On 28 Feb 2017, at 15:34, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> By the way …
> 
> While working in draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-01, I have reviewed all the 
> documents to be included as CE requirements for different transition 
> mechanisms, and one of them is RFC7598.
> 
> Then I was looking at your document draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 
> and I was surprised to read that this document, if approved, will update 
> RFC7568.
> 
> RFC7568 is about SSL 3.0.
> 
> So, my guess is that you meant to update RFC7598?
> 
> Just so the authors can update the XML to avoid this error to go on ...
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[email protected]>
> Fecha: martes, 28 de febrero de 2017, 14:45
> Para: Softwires-wg <[email protected]>
> CC: dhcwg <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
> Asunto: Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call for 
> draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017
> 
>    +1
> 
>    Saludos,
>    Jordi
> 
> 
>    -----Mensaje original-----
>    De: Softwires <[email protected]> en nombre de tianxiang li 
> <[email protected]>
>    Responder a: <[email protected]>
>    Fecha: martes, 28 de febrero de 2017, 14:24
>    Para: Tomek Mrugalski <[email protected]>
>    CC: Softwires-wg <[email protected]>, dhcwg <[email protected]>, 
> <[email protected]>
>    Asunto: Re: [Softwires] [dhcwg] Adoption call for 
> draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 - Respond by Mar 8th, 2017
> 
>        Hi all,
>        I participated in the review of this draft, I think it is an important 
> document for the dynamic provisioning of some 4over6 Softwire mechanisms. I 
> support its adoption.
> 
> 
>        Cheers,
>        Tianxiang
> 
> 
>        2017-02-23 1:37 GMT+08:00 Tomek Mrugalski <[email protected]>:
> 
>        Hi,
> 
>        This message initiates a two weeks long DHC WG adoption call on:
> 
>        Title: DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 Source Address Option
>        Pages: 9
>        Date: 2017-02-01
>        Document: draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07
>        Link: tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07 
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07>
> 
>        This document initially started as work intended to be adopted in
>        Softwires, but after a discussion with chairs, responsible AD (Suresh)
>        and presenting this work in DHC, the conclusion is to aim for DHC
>        adoption, not Softwires. Therefore this is a DHC adoption call.
> 
>        This message is cross-posted to Softwires to let Softwire experts weigh
>        in their opinion. Please be sure to post your comments to DHC list,
>        though. Comments sent by end of March 8th, 2017 are much appreciated.
> 
>        Bernie & Tomek
> 
>        _______________________________________________
>        dhcwg mailing list
>        [email protected]
>        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>        _______________________________________________
>        Softwires mailing list
>        [email protected]
>        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or 
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the 
> individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware 
> that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
> information, including attached files, is prohibited.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to