Hi Ian, all, The comments I have about this document are the following:
* Instead of (re)specifying the behavior it would be more appropriate to refer to draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast (RFC8114) when it makes sense (e.g., AFBR behavior, address mapping, CP, DP, etc.). * The document says the following: The mPrefix46 for SSM mode is also defined in Section 4.1 of [RFC7371] This is not true. RFC7371 is about flag bits not MPREFIX64. Instead of referring to RFC7371, adding a pointer to Section 5 of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast would make sense. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Ian > Farrer > Envoyé : jeudi 9 mars 2017 17:22 > À : Softwires-wg > Objet : [Softwires] WGLC For draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast - Please > respond by 23rd March > > Hi, > > The authors of draft-ietf-softwire-mesh-multicast-15 believe this document > is ready for advancement. We would like to issue a two week working group > last call finishing on 23rd March. > > Please send any substantive comments to the list and express your opinion > on whether this draft is ready for publication. You are also welcome to > send your editorial comments directly to the authors. > > Thanks, > Yong & Ian > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
