Hi Mingwei, Thank you for your email. Checking the comments that were received during the last WGLC, there is:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/LT2ttfqUXw4IjwGFFBBrPMayoiU <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/LT2ttfqUXw4IjwGFFBBrPMayoiU> Please could you respond to the questions it raises, particularly point 1. Thanks, Ian > On 26. Jul 2017, at 09:27, Mingwei Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Chairs, > > The draft of softwire mesh multicast was first proposed in September 2011 and > updated 15 times. We think the draft is mature and it is ready for the last > call. > > The recent revision history is as following: > > 2017 Apr 1. We updated the 16th version according to Med’s advice. > > 2017 Jan 10. We updated the 15th version according to IAB statement on IPv6 > <https://www.iab.org/2016/11/07/iab-statement-on-ipv6/>, where IAB expects > that the IETF will stop requiring IPv4 compatibility in new or extended > protocols. > > 2016 Nov 13. We updated the 14th version according to Ian’s advices. > > 2016 May 24. We asked for WGLC in the working group. > > 2016 May 22. We updated the 13th version, where we revised the language and > grammar throughout. > > 2016 Feb 4. We updated the 11th version, where we updated the security > consideration. > > Best regards, > > Mingwei > > -------------- > Mingwei Xu > 2017-07-26 > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
