Hi all, I also support it moving forward as a co-author. The MAP-E/T had been used by some operators, thus this document is useful for real deployment. Btw, the document was changed to get more comprehensive to cover different scenarios in the latest several versions, the authors (mostly by Yu Fu) really did some essential work on it.
Best regards, Bing > -----Original Message----- > From: Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yong Cui > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 9:44 PM > To: Softwires WG <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Yong Cui <[email protected]> > Subject: [Softwires] WGLC on draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-14 > > Hi folks, > > The authors of draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-14 believe this document is > ready > for advancement. > We would like to issue a working group last call starting from today to April > 9th. > > Please send your substantial comments to the list during the last call. You > are > also welcome to send your editorial comments directly to the authors. > > Thanks for reviewing the draft. > > > Yong Cui and Ian Farrer > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
