Hi Ben, Thank you.
I updated the editorial note to make clear this is about changes into the document. I also updated the document to take into account the comments from: Mirja, Benjamin, and Adam. An updated version with the changes is available online Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : mercredi 23 mai 2018 19:18 > À : The IESG > Cc : [email protected]; Ian Farrer; softwire- > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Objet : Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-15: > (with COMMENT) > > Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-15: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is well-written overall, but I was confused by the RFC editor note after > the abstract. I assume you mean for these updates to be done on matching text > throughout the document, but I originally read it to mean update the text in > the note itself, which is labeled for deletion. > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
