Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-softwire-yang-14: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-yang/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Alissa's discuss. Further to Benjamin's discuss, I note that the YANG modules in this document indicate two editors (I. Farrer and M. Bocadair) and five authors. Assuming this distinction is intentional, RFC 7322 points to a clear resolution: If there is a request for more than five authors, the stream-approving body needs to consider if one or two editors should have primary responsibility for this document, with the other individuals listed in the Contributors or Acknowledgements section. Based on the RFC 7322 text, I suspect that the best approach is moving the five non-editors to a "Contributors" section. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
