Hi Yong, Further to my previous email.
During the review of draft-ietf-softwire-yang, there is a comment about following the published format for the Security Considerations section of a document containing a YANG module. I wasn’t previously aware of this: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines> As this comment will also be applicable to draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel, I think we need to rewrite the Security Considerations section accordingly. Thanks, Ian > On 8. Jan 2019, at 17:48, ianfar...@gmx.com wrote: > > HI Yong, > > Sorry for the late response. I’m still catching up after the holidays… > > As a co-author, I support this document progressing. As you mention below, > separating out the iftunnels module from draft-ietf-softwire-yang into a new > draft was requested during the IANA review. meaning that > draft-ietf-softwire-yang (currently with the IESG) now has a normative > reference to this draft. > > Regarding the draft itself, the iftunnel module itself has already been > through the final WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-yang. As it models the IANA > tunnelType Definitions registry > (https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-6 > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/smi-numbers.xhtml#smi-numbers-6>), > we’ve tried to keep the format in line with other, similar documents with > YANG modules for other IANA registries (e.g. RFC7224). > > Thanks, > Ian > >> On 19. Dec 2018, at 08:26, Yong Cui <cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn >> <mailto:cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn>> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> There were the following progress on Softwire YANG and related work during >> the past couple of months: >> • draft-ietf-softwire-yang completed WGLC >> • During expert review, a YANG module for the iana-iftunnel registry >> was requested as the softwire module needs to reference it. >> • draft-ietf-softwire-yang was updated to include this module and Sheng >> ran a WGLC on the new content. This passed without comment. >> • During IANA review, it was requested that the iana-iftunnel YANG >> module was put into a separate document. >> • draft-ietf-softwire-yang was updated, removing the iana-iftunnel YANG >> module, and draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel was published containing just the >> module (it was posted as a WG doc as the content etc. is already under the >> scope of draft-ietf-softwire-yang) >> >> So now, we’d like to issue a WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-01. >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel/> >> >> Considering the coming Christmas and New Year, I would extend the WGLC to 3 >> weeks, i.e. Dec. 19, 2018 - Jan. 9, 2019. Please send your comments to our >> softwire mailing list, including your support or concerns. >> >> >> Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! >> >> Yong & Ian >> > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
