Hi Chairs, all, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Yong Cui [mailto:[email protected]] > Envoyé : samedi 26 janvier 2019 13:08 > À : [email protected] > Cc : Softwires-wg; [email protected] > Objet : advance draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel > > Dear authors and all , > > During the WGLC, we have some clear support and reasons to advance this I-D. > > Before that, I would like to know: > 1) if you know any IPR issues on this draft, and [Med] I don't have any IPR related to this I-D > 2) if you know any implementations on this one? > Additionally, would you please use the button of "check nits" to check this > I-D and try to avoid any error, flaws and warnings? [Med] Fixed. Here is the output of the idnits check for the draft (-03): == Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) No issues found here. == Thank you. > > Thanks, > > Yong & Ian _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
