Hi Suresh, Please see inline.
Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Envoyé : jeudi 13 juin 2019 06:01 > À : The IESG > Cc : draft-ietf-softwire-iftun...@ietf.org; Yong Cui; softwire- > cha...@ietf.org; cuiy...@tsinghua.edu.cn; softwires@ietf.org > Objet : Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-06: > (with COMMENT) > > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel-06: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-softwire-iftunnel/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have a hard time seeing the need for a generic UDP tunnel type (8) and > also > specific instances of UDP tunneling such as Teredo (14). I think it is > better > to go one way or another but not do both to avoid any confusion. [Med] These codes are already in the registry. This I-D is just echoing what is recorded in the current authoritative registry. If one of these codes is relaxed, the YANG module will be updated by IANA to reflect that. I do think that draft-thaler-iftype-reg is the right place to include a recommendation to encourage tunnel protocol designers to register their tunnel types rather than to reuse the generic UDP type. In any > case I > think RFC8085 *should not* be the sole reference for UDP tunneling as it > does > not specify UDP tunneling but provides guidelines for designers of UDP > based > tunneling mechanisms. [Med] That is the best reference we have for UDP. It is certainly better than 4087. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
