Thanks for the report. I agree with Eric. If we would make it more clear, we can use the following sentence then:
"Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase its size (typically either 20 or 28 bytes with fragmentation).” Cheers, -Yong > 2022年10月12日 22:45，Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta) <[email protected]> > 写道： > > That makes sense to me. > > Michael Overcash > Principal Architect, Premises Technology > C 678.637.5649 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2022 9:47 AM > To: RFC Errata System <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Wojciech Dec (wdec) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Cc: Overcash, Michael (CCI-Atlanta) <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7599 (7160) > > Thank you, Michael, for your report. > > I would though slightly modify your corrected text into: > > "Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase > its size (typically either 20 or 28 bytes)." > > -éric > > On 12/10/2022, 15:44, "RFC Errata System" <[email protected]> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7599, > "Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7160__;!!Hit2Ag!353LGaZsbdumiTzQWGG_70wKyv1Hodu5NDb_n4crAFfT6WnsJh88tNTr5iUohBgG5jkenJKWnv2toSS0ffE$ > > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Michael Overcash <[email protected]> > > Section: 10.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase > its size (typically by 20 bytes). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Translating an IPv4 packet to carry it across the MAP domain will increase > its size (typically by 28 bytes). > > Notes > ----- > In the context of MTU, it is important to account for packet > fragmentation. If an IPv4 packet is fragmented, the size will increase by 28 > bytes during translation. The IPv6 header is 20 bytes larger than the IPv4 > header, and in addition the 8 byte IPv6 Fragmentation Header must be added. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7599 (draft-ietf-softwire-map-t-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Mapping of Address and Port using Translation (MAP-T) > Publication Date : July 2015 > Author(s) : X. Li, C. Bao, W. Dec, Ed., O. Troan, S. Matsushima, > T. Murakami > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Softwires > Area : Internet > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
