Ah, but to further mess things up - the old sizes (4.00, 3.50) were
100% sidewalls (so 4.00x4.00).  The 4.10 (or anything else with a .10
increase from the standard size such as 3.60) was designated as a
"low profile" tire, so a 4.10 was a 4.00w x 90% sidewall, 3.60 was a
3.50w x 90% sidewall.  Which is why a modern 110/90 replaces the old
4.10, but a 100/100 would replace a 4.00.  

bk

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>                           SOHC4 Digest 4712
> 
> Topics covered in this issue include:
> 
>   1) Resubscribe?
>       by "Frogspawn Inc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 21:18:36 +0200
> From: "Frogspawn Inc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "sohc4" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Resubscribe?
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Nothing from the list for some time - have I been de-subscribed?
> Going through my huge pile of old Classis Bike magazines - often
> read and
> re-read - I found some tyre size conversions that puzzle me.
>  Old Size                   Modern                         Metric
> 2.50/2.75                  3.10                              80/90
> 3.00/3.25                  3.60                              90/90
> 3.50                          4.10                             
> 100/90
> 4.00                          4.25/85                        
> 110/90
> 4.70                          none                             
> 120/90
> 4.50/5.00                  5.10                              130/90
> 
> A bit of arithmetic shows that all is not equal. There are 25.4mm
> to one
> inch.  Old sizes and modern are expressed in inches whilst metric
> is, well,
> metric. Thus 4.00 (as in 4.00X18) is 101.6mm. 110/90 is 110mm width
> and 90%
> aspect ratio equals 99mm height a smidgeon less than 101.6mm.
> Modern 4.25/80
> is size, 4.25" and 85% aspect ratio that calculates to 3.61" so it
> seems a
> little small although the width is larger. The 3.25X18 is 3.25"
> equals
> 82.55mm. The said equivalent is 90/90 that to me works out at 90mm
> X 90%
> equals 81mm equals 3.18". Working this way and assuming a 90%
> aspect ratio,
> I get a theoretical 113/90 to replace a 4.00 and a 92/90 for a
> 3.25. OK so
> now that all is clear,I'll just go into my local tyre shop and
> demand a
> 113/90X18.
> Regards
> Paul (non metricated and still thinks in thou) H
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of SOHC4 Digest 4712
> ************************


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html

Reply via email to