The problem was some moron deleted /var/sadm/pkg on this box. Thanks for the suggestion.
Drew On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 14:25, Andrew Hall wrote: > Hmmm... Its possible. I did not download it. I am using the patch > from an NFS mount, so let me check. > > Drew > > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 13:09, Chris Cheshire wrote: > > Did you accidentally grab the intel instead of sparc cluster or vice versa? > > > > Andrew Hall wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I have a 2.6 box that I attempted to installed the 2.6 Recommended > > > Cluster Patch this morning. The odd thing is that every single patch > > > exited with Return Code 8. While Return Code 8 means that failed > > > attempting to install a patch to a software not installed, I am > > > concerned that every patch exited in this way. > > > > > > Looking in the patch logfile I see the following for every patch: > > > > > > Checking installed patches... > > > One or more patch packages included in > > > 112542-01 are not installed on this system. > > > > > > Patchadd is terminating. > > > Installing 106125-16... > > > > > > WARNING: /usr/sbin/patchadd is being used to install this patch. > > > > > > What should I do next? Is my box already up to date? Is it so behind > > > that cluster patches won't work? > > > > > > Thanks for your time in advance, > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Solaris-Users mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Solaris-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users > > _______________________________________________ > Solaris-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users _______________________________________________ Solaris-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
