good point.
will do it next time.

once again, thanks for your help.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any comments or statements made in this transmission reflect the views of 
the sender and are not necessarily the views of the Federal Reserve Bank 
of New York.



Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/28/2005 04:18 PM
Please respond to
Solaris-Users mailing list <[email protected]>


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: [Solaris-Users] KernelID and patch 112438-03






> 
> Darren, thanks a lot!!!!
> 
> able to install the patch using the second method, adding an install 
> account install:x:0:1:installpatch braindamage:/:/bin/true
> 
> of course, for security reasons, the account was deleted after the patch 

> was installed.
> not very comfortable with the idea of leaving an account with uid=0 even 

> though it is a locked account.
> I think Sun has to do something to fix this. Creating an account with 
> uid=0 and leave it on the system is kind of risky. The auditors of my 
> company will not buy it.

I've never had to use that method.  Normally it's more of a problem with
the directory that the patch is in (especially if NFS is involved).

So extracting the patch into /tmp and applying from there has always
been sufficient for me.

-- 
Darren Dunham                                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
_______________________________________________
Solaris-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users

_______________________________________________
Solaris-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users

Reply via email to