I had a similar problem in the past. The way how it was solved was to move patch cluster to /tmp and install from there.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any comments or statements made in this transmission reflect the views of the sender and are not necessarily the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Simon Annear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/15/2005 05:51 PM Please respond to Solaris-Users mailing list <[email protected]> To Solaris-Users mailing list <[email protected]> cc Subject Re: [Solaris-Users] Cluster patch inconsistancies. My guesses One of the servers didn't reboot ? The uname -v just shows the kernel patch level, so it indicates that the kernal patch hasn't applied (or taken effect) Try just running "showrev" to check out what kernel patch is applied to each. Solaris wrote: > Hello all, > > I've got a jumpstart server that recently jumpstarted 3 separate, > brand new Sun Fire V210 systems. All three used the same jumpstart > profile, which installed the same version of Solaris 8, the same OS > install level (SUNWcall), partitioned the disks the same and all three > called the same finish script. In that finish script I automatically > install the Feb 2005 recommended patch cluster. When these V210s were > finished jumpstarting and they rebooted after the patch cluster > install, I looked at their kernel patch versions with "uname -v", and > 2 are the same version and 1 is not. It is imperative that these be > the same as they are getting shipped to customers. A few questions: > > -Any idea why these "uname -v" values would be different? > -Any idea how to tell what cluster patch the OS thinks is installed? I > don't think there is an equivalent, but something similar to > /etc/release, but for the patch cluster. > -Any way to insure 2 systems are at the same patch level without > having to do a manual comparison of a showrev -p output? > -Could the "uname -v" be different if there was a hidden hardware > difference such as a motherboard rev? > > It seems the cluster patch area is a bit of a mystery on Solaris any > hints on how to ensure 2 systems are the same from a patching > perspective, would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks in advance and happy holidays. > > -Mark > _______________________________________________ > Solaris-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users _______________________________________________ Solaris-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users _______________________________________________ Solaris-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
