On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 07:50:10 -0800 (PST) Darren Dunham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, are there any implications associated with setting /bin/sh > > symlink to point to /usr/xpg4/bin/sh? Will it break anything? > > It's certainly not supported and could break things. > > /bin/sh and /usr/xpg4/bin/sh are not identical. Some script may be > relying on /bin/sh behavior and fail under the xpg4 version. > > I don't know that such scripts are common, but you're definitely on your > own if you try it. It seems like a drastic change though. Any > particular reason you want to do this? Well I build various software packages on Solaris, it would make things easier if /bin/sh was a Posix compliant shell. _______________________________________________ Solaris-Users mailing list [email protected] http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
