I have looked around for something that looked out of the ordinary. What I
find strange is that
when I try to execute smc from:

/usr/sadm/lib/smc/bin/

I get the following error:

./smc[11]: /lib/functions:  not found

The directory functions does not exist.

David

On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:59 AM, David Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote:

> #  ls -l /usr/bin/java
> lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other         16 Mar 16 13:12 /usr/bin/java ->
> ../java/bin/java
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Romeo Ninov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> What is result of
>>  ls -l /usr/bin/java
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 5:26 PM, David Hamilton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Jozef,
>> >
>> > # which java
>> > /usr/bin/java
>> > # echo $PATH
>> > /usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/openwin/bin:/usr/ucb:/usr/bin/java
>> >
>> > ./smc &
>> > 1856
>> > # No suitable Java runtime found in any of the following directories:
>> >        /usr/java /usr/java /usr
>> > Please set the JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to a Java 2
>> > installation and run /usr/sadm/lib/smc/bin/smc again.
>> >
>> > Thanks very much,
>> >
>> > David
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Jozef Babjak <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> What is your PATH and what 'which java' says?
>> >>
>> >> J.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 15:28, David Hamilton <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Hello All,
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Recently a Solaris 10 x86 server was built.  When I try to start smc
>> I
>> >> > receive the following error.
>> >> >
>> >> > # No suitable Java runtime found in any of the following directories:
>> >> >        /usr/java /usr/java /usr
>> >> > Please set the JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to a Java 2
>> >> > installation and run /usr/sadm/lib/smc/bin/smc again.
>> >> >
>> >> > I reinstalled java.
>> >> >
>> >> > # java -version
>> >> > java version "1.6.0_12"
>> >> > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_12-b04)
>> >> > Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 11.2-b01, mixed mode)
>> >> >
>> >> > Additionally:
>> >> >
>> >> > lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other          7 Mar 16 13:12 j2sdk1.4.2_18
>> ->
>> >> > ../j2se
>> >> > drwxr-xr-x   8 root     bin          512 Mar 16 13:21 packages
>> >> > lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other         18 Mar 16 14:32 jdk1.5.0_17 ->
>> >> > instances/jdk1.5.0
>> >> > drwxr-xr-x  17 root     bin         1024 Mar 18 10:49 instances
>> >> > lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other         18 Mar 18 10:49 jdk1.6.0_12 ->
>> >> > instances/jdk1.6.0
>> >> > lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     other         11 Mar 18 10:49 latest ->
>> >> jdk1.6.0_12
>> >> >
>> >> > Any thoughts on this?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > David
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > Solaris-Users mailing list
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Solaris-Users mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Solaris-Users mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>>                              Regards: Romeo Ninov
>>       http://www.ninov.info
>> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Solaris-Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Solaris-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/solaris-users

Reply via email to