Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Solr Wiki" for change 
notification.

The "AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters" page has been changed by ShalinMangar.
The comment on this change is: Fixed typo "seabisuit".
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters?action=diff&rev1=71&rev2=72

--------------------------------------------------

  Keep in mind that while the !SynonymFilter will happily work with synonyms 
containing multiple words (ie: "`sea biscuit, sea biscit, seabiscuit`") The 
recommended approach for dealing with synonyms like this, is to expand the 
synonym when indexing.  This is because there are two potential issues that can 
arrise at query time:
  
   1. The Lucene !QueryParser tokenizes on white space before giving any text 
to the Analyzer, so if a person searches for the words `sea biscit` the 
analyzer will be given the words "sea" and "biscit" seperately, and will not 
know that they match a synonym.
-  1. Phrase searching (ie: `"sea biscit"`) will cause the !QueryParser to pass 
the entire string to the analyzer, but if the !SynonymFilter is configured to 
expand the synonyms, then when the !QueryParser gets the resulting list of 
tokens back from the Analyzer, it will construct a !MultiPhraseQuery that will 
not have the desired effect.  This is because of the limited mechanism 
available for the Analyzer to indicate that two terms occupy the same position: 
there is no way to indicate that a "phrase" occupies the same position as a 
term.  For our example the resulting !MultiPhraseQuery would be `"(sea | sea | 
seabiscuit) (biscuit | biscit)"` which would not match the simple case of 
"seabisuit" occuring in a document
+  1. Phrase searching (ie: `"sea biscit"`) will cause the !QueryParser to pass 
the entire string to the analyzer, but if the !SynonymFilter is configured to 
expand the synonyms, then when the !QueryParser gets the resulting list of 
tokens back from the Analyzer, it will construct a !MultiPhraseQuery that will 
not have the desired effect.  This is because of the limited mechanism 
available for the Analyzer to indicate that two terms occupy the same position: 
there is no way to indicate that a "phrase" occupies the same position as a 
term.  For our example the resulting !MultiPhraseQuery would be `"(sea | sea | 
seabiscuit) (biscuit | biscit)"` which would not match the simple case of 
"seabiscuit" occuring in a document
  
  Even when you aren't worried about multi-word synonyms, idf differences still 
make index time synonyms a good idea. Consider the following scenario:
  

Reply via email to