: I agree. However, I think that a wiki page can serve the purpose of : providing a high-level description of the file. Trying to read a heavily : commented config file can be unwieldy if you're just trying to get a : primary understanding of it.
yeah, i'd suggest leaving the wiki in place, with all of the existing verbage, but remove anything that's just cut/paste from the sample file. the biggest advantage in my mind to having a wiki page (instead of just a heavily commented sample) is that *anyone* who has used solr can udapte the wiki with their advice/suggestions on config options -- without needing to submit a patch and waiting for it to be commited to the sample. -Hoss
