I'm OK with a downgrade... there wasn't any particular reason to go with Jetty6 other than it was the latest-and-greatest. There is still the tomcat vs jetty issue though:
http://www.nabble.com/tutorial-or-demo-download-t1121522.html#a2933223 It does seem like the first thing many people try to do is get Solr running with Tomcat. Perhaps that's another reason for the example to be Tomcat based? -Yonik On 4/24/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had trouble returning a field from Solr (as detailed in a previous > e-mail) using the built-in Jetty. It worked fine with Tomcat, and I > just tried it with Jetty 5.1.11RC0 and it works as well. It seems > the Jetty version in Solr's repository is an "unstable" version that > has some type of response rendering bug (with use of NIO?) but that > the latest "stable" release works fine. > > Are there reasons we need to have an unstable version of Jetty built > into the example app? Or would it be ok to switch to 5.1.11RC0?
