On 5/4/06, Ken Krugler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 5/4/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I've been thinking that Solr could benefit from "auto-valued" fields,
>>such as a datestamp. This would be a field defined in the schema,
>>but its value comes from the Solr server itself rather than the
>>client POSTing documents. The client wouldn't post such a value at
>>all (it'd be an error if it did, perhaps, or it could override the
>>automatic value?).
>>
>>Does this make sense as a feature request to the Solr server?
>
>Definitely... I had previously thought about auto-incrementing fields
>(for documents without a natural uniqueKey)... but to be useful, that
>id may need to be returned in the response.
>
>A server-set date field both makes sense *and* is easy to implement.
And then there's the auto-generated unique ID value that I'd like :)
Yeah... that's what what I meant by auto-incrementing fields.
For that to be useful, the generated id would need to be returnd in
the response to the add, right?
-Yonik
