On 5/10/06, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Odd :) But, I've adjusted my code to account for this. Why would you ever want different names than what is specified in the config file?
You probably wouldn't... as far as I remember, it was just the easiest way to get the name at the time. Many parts of Solr were done in an extreme rapid-apps type environment... I implemented it as fast as I could, no peer review, often past midnight, etc ;-) The cache name can be nice for the cache to have when implementing logging or toString() for instance. Since I already had the name, I used it as the key. Something like CacheConfig (it represents the entry in solrconfig.xml) could have a getCacheName(), removing the need for the cache to keep track of it.
Also, it is confusing because there is a name() and getName() methods required to implement a SolrCache.
Definitely... I hadn't even noticed that before :-) -Yonik
