On 6/8/06, jason rutherglen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah LinkedConcurrentHashMap would be nice, that could be done. Is it needed for anything right now?
I don't think so... if it existed, I would have tried it out against the standard synchronized LinkedHashMap. For most uses I doubt it would be an improvement though... at least for our hardware with 2-4 CPUs per box. -Yonik
