: Yes, it depends on the customization.  What I had in mind was not just
: formating changes, but adding additional content to the pages or adding a
: new page.  With servlets it can still be done.  But then it will require
: building Solr from source.  A little more involved.

are you talking about clients adding their own modifcations to the pages
(or new pages) when they install Solr? ... that would require unpacking
the WAR and at that point we might as well ask them to recompile --
letting people specify a flat HTML file to include on the admin page is
one thing, but if people want custom code in the admin pages expectingthem
to recompile doesn't seem like much of a stretch.

:
: Bill
:
: On 8/29/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >
: >
: > : Leaving them as JSPs would make it easier to customize the admin pages.
: >
: > It depends on the customization.  CSS is still easy to do with servlet
: > output.  if you look at the JSPs right now, the most complicated HTML I
: > found is actually being created inside of scriptlet blocks that would be
: > *easier* to macke sense of in a Servlet.
: >
: > :
: > : Bill
: > :
: > : On 8/28/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > : > + * refactor all of the JSP pages into servlets so a JDK/JSP
: > compiler
: > : >
: > : > : It seems like a simpler option would be to just move to Tomcat 5.5or
: > : > : Jetty 6, both of which handle JSPs file with a JRE.
: > : >
: > : > that solves confusion people have when running the example out of the
: > box,
: > : > but doesn't help situations where people try using Solr in their own
: > : > Servlet Container.   I just wanted to through the idea out there since
: > we
: > : > don't really gain that much with the current JSPs, but it has caused
: > us
: > : > some annoyance.
: > : >
: > : > (an added bonus is the entire webapp would be compiled at build time,
: > so
: > : > there would be less risk of commiting changes to src/java that seemed
: > : > simple but actually cause compile failures in the webapp)
: > : >
: > : >
: > : >
: > : > -Hoss
: > : >
: > : >
: > :
: >
: >
: >
: > -Hoss
: >
: >
:



-Hoss

Reply via email to