: Since I was already there, I went ahead and committed a description : for test-reports, and javadoc. But the "junit" target doesn't need a : description since "test" is the main testing entry point.
actually, something i've been thinking would be nice is if there was a way to run the tests and generate the test reports with one target -- even if the tests fail. (not currenlty possible because of the fast fail behavior of ant) Since "test" is currently just a shell arround "junit" what if we replace the dependency on the "junit" target with an <antcall>, preserve the property of tests.failed, then <antcall> "test-reports" and fail based on tests.failed ? people who don't wnat test reports can just run "ant junit" (which we would want to add a description to in this case) That should all work fairly well right? : : Erik : : : On Sep 13, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: : : > On 9/13/06, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : > : >> ...I think the test-reports target is worth a description... : > : > Just found out that the junit target also has no description, so it : > might be on purpose. : > : > Still, I think making people aware of automated tests is a Good Thing, : > so I'd add descriptions to both. : > : > -Bertrand : -Hoss
