On 9/20/06, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree that a release would be useful for marketing, but I also
think it would help exercise the community and the release process.

Definitely.  It also introduces oni like backward compatibility issues
which need thought.  Solr trunk currently has more volatility in this
regard than mature products.

I just discovered Solr on Friday and I've been telling people about
it, but every e-mail includes "you need to be OK with nightly builds."

Being OK with nightly builds means that you need to run your own
QA on the whole build every time you change. Kinda expensive.

It is always necessary to do QA.  The Solr trunk tends to be modified
only by large reviewed patches, and hence tends to be quite stable.  A
release would certainly not receive sufficiently more thorough vetting
for me to feel comfortable dispensing with my own QA.

best,
-Mike

Reply via email to