On 11/7/06, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/7/06 2:30 PM, "Mike Klaas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/7/06, Walter Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 1. Adding fuzzy to the DisMax specs.
>
> What do you envisage the implementation looking like?
Probably continue with the template-like patterns already there.
title^2.0 (search title field with boost of 2.0)
title~ (search title field with fuzzy matching)
Ah, I see what you mean. Seems reasonable (as someone who is utter
unfamiliar with fuzzy queries in lucene).
<>
Ah, I missed the <analyzer> example with a stock Lucene analyzer.
Oops. I still need to write an Analyzer, because there is no standard
phonetic search in Lucene today. There are some patches and addons
floating around.
Is the state of the art in phonetic token generation reasonable? I've
been rather disappointed with some implementations (eg. SOUNDEX in
MySQL, MSSQL).
cheers,
-Mike
