Ooops, sent a bit too early -- meant "wow, I was really wrong about this, good to know" and "cool, thanks for pointing it out" ;)
Yoav On 12/1/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wow, cool. Yoav On 12/1/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahh, here's the pointer: > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > ''' > If A Distribution Contains Code Under Several Licenses, Should It > Contain Several License Files? > > No - all license information should be contained in the LICENSE file. > > When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE > file should contain details of all these licenses. For each component > which is not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license > under which the component is distributed should be appended to the > LICENSE file. > ''' > > -Yonik > > On 12/1/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 12/1/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I thought this was exactly what the NOTICE file is for? Mention all > > > the code from other projects we use, including ASL code. LICENSE is > > > just for our own (Solr) stuff. > > > > LICENSE needs to apply to everything in the distribution. > > Solr's current LICENSE has ASL 2.0, followed by the license for the > > XML parser we use, as directed by legal-discuss. > > > > -Yonik > > >
