[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73?page=comments#action_12456169 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-73: ------------------------------
As you said Walter: documentation doesn't fix an unclear product ... if Solr supports using package aliasing in it's configs, but we don't use package aliasing in the sample configs that people will copy to make their own configs, people may never realize it's an option, and be very confused when discussions on the mailing list (or in wiki documentation) use the aliases -- the sample configuration files should demonstrate *every* possible directive that can appear in those files, unless there is some directive that is directly contradictory to a more usefull directive allready there -- in which case it should still be there but should be commented out. The sample configs are the one thing we can be certain people will *have* to look at when using Solr for the first time, so it's our best opportunity to document what is possible. We shouldn't remove the aliases from the sample files unless we remove aliasing from Solr alltogether > schema.xml and solrconfig.xml use CNET-internal class names > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-73 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Components: search > Reporter: Walter Underwood > > The configuration files in the example directory still use the old > CNET-internal class names, like solr.LRUCache instead of > org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache. This is confusing to new users and should > be fixed before the first release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
