[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12464661
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-106:
-----------------------------------
I did have a reservation about always guaranteeing a sort order... I wasn't
sure if it would always be easy to maintain term-sort order in future
implementations. If that were the case, *maybe* it should be
sort=count|term|none... might be more future-flexible, but harder to remember
than a boolean.
Just curious, what are your usecases for facet paging, and what percent of
facet queries would have an offset other than 0?
> new facet params: facet.sort, facet.mincount, facet.offset
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-106
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-106
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: facet_params.patch
>
>
> a couple of new facet params:
> facet lists become pageable with facet.offset, facet.limit (idea from Erik)
> facet.sort explicitly specifies sort order (true for count descending, false
> for natural index order)
> facet.mincount: minimum count for facets included in response (idea from JJ,
> deprecate zeros)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
