On Jan 31, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Oh, and there have been numerous people interested in "updateable"
: documents, so it would be nice if that part was in the update
handler.
We'd have to make it very clear that this only works if all fields are
STORED.
That is perfectly reasonable, for sure. And I would support an
"update" feature issuing an exception if it detected this case.
There is an important caveat to all fields being stored though... if
an update was sending in updated fields for all the non-stored
fields, and only stored fields were being copied internally, all
would be fine too.
I think eventually we could have this sort of feature internally copy
the terms for non-stored fields somehow, but maybe that would only
come along once Lucene supported something to facilitate this more?
Erik
