[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471846
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-152:
-------------------------------
whoops ... looks like comment collision ... yeah, i'm thinking altq would be in
"solr standard syntax" and if at soem point we add anotations about query
syntax it would support them.
(a q.type param wouldn't really solve this problem ... a default Q of "*:* in
the solorconfig would requre a defualt QTYPE of "standard" or something ...
whch means clients clients sending a "q" in the simple dismax syntaxwould have
to allways specify q.type=dismax, unless q was blank in which case overriding
the q.type would break the default q ... so we're back where we started: the
client code needing ot look at the users iput and change something about the
request if it's blank)
> Dismax should not require 'q'
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-152
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-152
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Ryan McKinley
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: SOLR-152-DismaxNoQ.patch, SOLR-152-DismaxNoQ.patch
>
>
> using fq=xxx should be sufficient to make a valid query
> see:
> http://www.nabble.com/dismax-without-q%3D-tf3198431.html#a8880594
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
