On 3/19/07, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Thanks for comitting Mike, sorry i never got around to reviewing the patch.

Just out of curiousity though, can anyone explain why ConvertedLegacyTest
was functioning properly before this change?

I'm just wondering if we're breaking a case people might have been relying
on because it functioned (even if it wasn't intended to).

That's a good point--the change didn't affect the the point of the
test (which was sorting-related), but there was likely some reason
that the original test used id_i.

Ryan, what problem did you encounter that prompted the change?

cheers,
-Mike

Reply via email to