[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492369
]
J.J. Larrea commented on SOLR-217:
----------------------------------
+1 to Hoss' elaboration of Yonik's suggested approach, except for
reverse-compatibility (where we DO want an error for unknown fields) schema.xml
should probably read something like:
<!-- since fields of this type are by default not stored or indexed, any
data added to
them will be ignored outright
-->
<fieldtype name="ignored" stored="false" indexed="false"
class="solr.StrField" />
...
<!-- uncomment the following to ignore any fields that don't already match
an existing
field name or dynamic field, rather than reporting them as an error.
alternately, change the type="ignored" to some other type e.g. "text"
if you want
unknown fields indexed and/or stored by default -->
<!--dynamicField name="*" type="ignored" /-->
> schema option to ignore unused fields
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-217
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-217
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: update
> Affects Versions: 1.2
> Reporter: Will Johnson
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.2
>
> Attachments: ignoreNonIndexedNonStoredField.patch,
> ignoreUnnamedFields.patch
>
>
> One thing that causes problems for me (and i assume others) is that Solr is
> schema-strict in that unknown fields cause solr to throw exceptions and there
> is no way to relax this constraint. this can cause all sorts of serious
> problems if you have automated feeding applications that do things like
> SELECT * FROM table1 or where you want to add other fields to the document
> for processing purposes before sending them to solr but don't want to deal
> with 'cleanup'
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.