FYI, I'm in the process of updating to the latest nightly of lucene now. I'm getting a test failure though... currently looking into it.
-Yonik On 5/14/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/14/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 14-May-07, at 1:01 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > > > I've audited the Lucene changes since 2.1, and don't see anything > > problematic, so perhaps we should upgrade to the latest lucene trunk > > to get: > > - file descriptor usage reduction (only one descriptor for all > > norms now) > > - leading + trailing wildcard fix > > - performance improvements (mainly lazy prox skipping) > > - QueryParser parsing + escaping fixes > > - minor sloppy phrase query fixes > > Sounds good to me. I recall for some reason that the payload patch > had been applied, but that either might be wrong or not a concern. It has been applied, but it's of minimal concern since there isn't currently a plan to utilize it in Solr, and if it's not used the file formats don't change. -Yonik
