Yonik Seeley wrote:
The whole topTerms thing is exactly the same concept as faceting with *:* as a base (with perhaps the exception of ignoring deleted docs by using df?) Should these parameters be aligned somehow?
Using the faceting implementation would be good too... since you would get the all the caching etc.
maybe it can directly use faceting parameters (and implementation) for "topTerms" -- if nothing is specified for "facet.field", it will add all fields (alternatively, normal faceting could support *, but that seems like a bad idea in the general case)
I'll take a look at that and see how it feels...
