[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498336
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-247:
-------------------------------

I have a really hard time imagining anything but the most trivial use cases for 
facet.field=* ... it doesn't really sime like a problem in need of a solution.

with somehting like fl=*, we're only talking about stored fields ... storing a 
field makes no sense unless you plan on returning it in the field list some of 
the time, so fl=* makes sense as a "return all of hte fields that are possible 
to return" option.

There are *lots* of reasons why a field might be indexed though, so faceting on 
every indexed field doesn't seem like it would ever make sense.

in my opinion a "best practice" is not to use fl=* unless you are debugging 
anyway, otherwise you find yourself getting slammed with large amounts of data 
you don't want as the index evolves over time ... something like facet.field=* 
would be worse because it's not just the amount of data getting returned that 
would increase, but the amount of computation (and time and poor cache 
performance) that would spike as well.

if we do this, i would think it only makes sense to generalize the use of "*" 
in both fl and facet.field into a true glob style syntax, so we can at least 
encourage people who want this type of syntax to use a naming convention to 
help limit how much they hurt themselves.

(i have no problem giving people enough rope to hang themselves, but we 
shouldn't tie a noose in the rope before we give it to them)

 

> Allow facet.field=* to facet on all fields (without knowing what they are)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-247
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-247
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: SOLR-247-FacetAllFields.patch
>
>
> I don't know if this is a good idea to include -- it is potentially a bad 
> idea to use it, but that can be ok.
> This came out of trying to use faceting for the LukeRequestHandler top term 
> collecting.
> http://www.nabble.com/Luke-request-handler-issue-tf3762155.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to