[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12519278
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-332:
-------------------------------
It's been a while since I looked closely at FieldType, but i seem to remember a
similar discussion coming up regarding the properties and isTokenized.
If people want to put logic like this in custom FieldTypes i think it makes
more sense to add accessors (ala: isStored()) that can be used to check the
prop values (or be overridden completely by subclasses to ignore the property
outright) then it would to expose the properties directly.
I agree trueProperties and falseProperties aren't curently safe to use in
subclasses -- i think the right way to fix that is to take away their protected
status and make them private.
> Visibility of static int fields in FieldProperties should be increased to
> allow custom FieldTypes to use them
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-332
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-332
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Jonathan Woods
> Priority: Minor
>
> Constants in org.apache.solr.schema aren't visible to classes outside that
> package, yet they're useful e.g. for custom FieldTypes. Could their
> visibility be increased?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
