On 9/21/07, Stu Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps we should attempt to "merge" the RMI backend of SOLR-255 with the > high level approach taken in SOLR-303? Or do you have more experience with > other brands of RPC?
I think any approach is best done at that high level... so an RMI interface would share some of the same logic with the dispatch filter. It's the high-level coarsed grained approach that will get us good performance... trying to pretend that remote objects are local and executing the same logic one would in a single server isn't a good idea. I have very little RMI experience... which is why I initially thought of HTTP too, but that's not the best excuse :-) -Yonik