On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 22:51 -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote: > : > I'm not sure which "lib home" you are talking about, but I'm certainly > : > open to a patch that allows us to bundle junit we want so new developers > : > don't have to get it themselves ... i tried doing this not too long ago > : > when i read that <taskdefs> could speficy classpaths for finding the task > : > -- it worked great forsome things (like PMD) but i couldn't get it to > work > : > with ant to save my life. > : > : done > > It's times like this that i wish i could get away with using the > expression "Crikey!" without seeming compleltey phoney. > > I was about to point out that all this patch does is include junit, and > doesn't solve the problem of the ant-junit.jar ... but then I realized > that going back at least as far as and 1.6.2, "ant-junit.jar" is included > with the ant release. When i tried to solve this before, i assume i'd put > that ant-junit.jar in my ANT_LIB when i put junit.jar there -- and that to > do this right we'd need to bundle ant-junit.jar into solr as well (and > that's what i couldn't get to work). > > now i really feel like an idiot.
jeje, do not be so hard on you! That is why a healthy community solves many problems very quick. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
