[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12532767
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-334:
-----------------------------------
re localParams: right now they are map<String,String> (I wanted to keep it
lightweight)
but I could perhaps see one wanting multi-valued params in the future.
Should localParams be changed to map<String,String[]> or to SolrParams?
Thoughts?
Also, any syntax thoughts/improvements?
I like <!a=1 b=2> fine in cleartext, but if you need to configure it in XML,
then it's a bit uglier because of the needed escaping, but I'm not sure if it
warrants a change to something else for that alone.
> pluggable query parsers
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-334
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-334
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: qparser.patch, qparser.patch
>
>
> One should be able to optionally specify an alternate query syntax on a
> per-query basis
> http://www.nabble.com/Using-HTTP-Post-for-Queries-tf3039973.html#a8483387
> Many benefits, including avoiding the need to do query parser escaping for
> simple term or prefix queries.
> Possible Examples:
> fq=<!term field="myfield">The Term
> fq=<!prefix field="myfield">The Prefix
> q=<!qp op="AND">a b
> q=<!xml><?xml...> // lucene XML query syntax?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
