Thanks Mike. I realized the issue was not defined. I appreciate the
guidance about process...very much.
Billy
Mike Klaas wrote:
On 2-Nov-07, at 11:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/2/07 6:54:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Even if
the actual problem is at the Lucene level, perhaps it would be worth
considering changes to the default to get around it.
newbie here. is this common practice? find a bug in a tightly coupled
dependency and not deal with it there?
No--we fix bugs in Lucene if there is a genuine problem there.
However, it isn't clear that this is a Lucene-caused problem.
-Mike
