[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550435
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-192:
-----------------------------------
{code}
There are some changes pending in Lucene search.function that I am about to
commit.
I would like to first make change that these changes are not conflicting with
any
new functionality in Solr.
{code}
Doron, I'd just go ahead and make whatever changes you see fit in Lucene, and
Solr should be able to adapt to it when someone gets that particular itch to
scratch. It's not like we can make a backward compatible change at the source
level in solr-land anyway (because of package + class name changes).
> Move FunctionQuery to Lucene
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-192
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-192
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Attachments: SOLR-192-functionQueries.patch
>
>
> FunctionQuery is a useful concept to have in Lucene core. Deprecate the Solr
> implementation and migrate it Lucene core. Have the deprecated Solr version
> call the Lucene version.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-446
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
