[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12580148#action_12580148
 ] 

jayson.minard edited comment on SOLR-507 at 3/18/08 3:42 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

A related item from Lucene project...

* LUCENE-626 "Extended spell checker with phrase support and adaptive user 
session analysis" provides phrase-level spell suggestions.

And tracking comments about spell suggestion algorithms just in case this comes 
up:

* [Spelling Checker using 
Lucene|http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2007/12/spelling-checker-with-lucene.html]



      was (Author: jayson.minard):
    A related item from Lucene project...

* LUCENE-626 "Extended spell checker with phrase support and adaptive user 
session analysis" provides phrase-level spell suggestions.
  
> Spell Checking Improvements
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-507
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-507
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: spellchecker
>            Reporter: Jayson Minard
>
> Creating a placeholder issue to track Spell Checking Improvements.  
> Individual issues can later be created and linked for each area of separable 
> concern when they are determined.  
> Areas to discuss include:
> # spell suggestions from within the current query (minus terms being 
> corrected) and filter so that suggestions are always valid
> ** need approaches to merging the spelling list with the current mask of 
> valid records.  Also, is this a better change to Lucene first, or something 
> that belongs in Solr?
> ** need to add spell checking as query component and make available to 
> various query handlers
> ** spell checking to be field specific to support responding correctly with 
> dismax queries
> # spell suggestions from a distributed search (SOLR-303)
> # spell suggestions as a search component to augment other queries
> What are other typical areas of concern, or suggestions for improvements for 
> spell checking that can be tracked?  
> I am willing to look at driving a patch for this area, especially for spell 
> checking working within the current result set, and across  distributed 
> search.  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to