On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Synchronizing solrconfig is not a very desired behavior. Typically the > solrconfigs of master and slaves tend to differ. For instance we may > disable the UpdateHandler in slaves and there may be tuning done in > master to optimize indexing etc etc. The index data is not dependent > on the config itself.
+1 for not synchronizing the solrconfig.xml itself. But perhaps we could have a solrconfig.slave.xml which could be synchronized with slaves' solrconfig.xml if present? -- Guillaume
