: We can probably do away with hard-links if a core swap (rename) can be made : to work without downtime.
One thing to keep in mind if you rely on core swapping as an integral part of replication is that you won't be able to take advantage of "newSearcher" events or autowarming of caches (because the cores will be independent of eachother) .. an equivilent could probably be written to warm a new core using info from another core with similar cache configurations, but it's not something that exists yet. > * getFileList . Get the names of index files and their checksums. > (NamedList response) > * getFilePart: for 1...n of configured chunk size (simple binary > output/http) you'll also want some "snapshooter" equivilent on the master to ensure an isolated named copy of the index that is garunteed to never change no matter how long hte client takes to copy all the parts. -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -Hoss
