[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-572:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: SOLR-572.patch

WARNING:  This patch compiles _ONLY_.  I do NOT claim it is semantically 
equivalent to the earlier patches although that is my goal and I don't think I 
am far off.  I have not tested it in any way, shape or form.  I am only putting 
it up here as a first cut of the abstractions I have in mind, so please provide 
feedback based on that, especially in regards to the SolrSpellChecker class.  
Most interesting, there, is the passing in of the IndexReader.  I know not all 
spellers are going to need the IndexReader, so ideally, it would be something 
that is passed in or set during the construction of the speller, but I don't 
think that will work, or at least I am not aware of how to make it work just 
yet.  

My next step is to add unit tests of the individual spell checkers and then the 
component itself.

> Spell Checker as a Search Component
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-572
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-572
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: spellchecker
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>            Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>             Fix For: 1.3
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, 
> SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch, SOLR-572.patch
>
>
> Expose the Lucene contrib SpellChecker as a Search Component. Provide the 
> following features:
> * Allow creating a spell index on a given field and make it possible to have 
> multiple spell indices -- one for each field
> * Give suggestions on a per-field basis
> * Given a multi-word query, give only one consistent suggestion
> * Process the query with the same analyzer specified for the source field and 
> process each token separately
> * Allow the user to specify minimum length for a token (optional)
> Consistency criteria for a multi-word query can consist of the following:
> * Preserve the correct words in the original query as it is
> * Never give duplicate words in a suggestion

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to