I could go either way on this.... I agree with Grant that the "right" way to do things is to use Spring... but that is in the future. Noble already has the code, so the issue is to commit now or not. I don't care much about getting an XSD for solrconfig myself, but others may...
Anyone else have thoughts on this? -Yonik On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > : It is very hard to validate a config purely using an XSD. We have to > : rely on the > : components themselves to do a validation and I guess it is fine. > > agreed .. but it would be nice if (someday) you can at least check that a > config is syntactically correct without running Solr ... an XSD can help > with that. > > : user every day. According to me the user experience is the most > : important thing. I don't really > : care how many extra lines of code I write to achieve that > > I agree ... i'm just pointing out trade off. > > > > > -Hoss > >
