On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good catch . but it is not obvious that the refCount was incremented . > Should we not have a method to return the searcher without > incrementing the refcount?
Without the refcount incremented, you have no guarantees that the searcher won't be closed in another thread before you have a chance to do anything with it. -Yonik
