On Sep 5, 2008, at 5:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
We will need another build that incorporates SOLR-755, but people
should keep testing / evaluation this current release candidate.
Actually, it's not quite a release candidate, because we wouldn't
release it as is because it's built as a release candidate (RC2 is in
all the metadata). Perhaps in the future we should make release
candidates as we would the final build and then actually use the last
one?
I figured I would create the "final" one once we were there, which I
am hoping is the next one. I think we can leave it up to the RM to
decide what they feel is easiest for them.
Our simple "example" is filling up a little more... do we really need
the very special purpose exampleAnalysis directory? Seems like
instructions in the documentation or on a wiki page would be more
appropriate.
The docs are slightly different. We could consider having separate
examples, or just doing it on the wiki page. I doubt the AnalysisRH
is used by many.
CHANGES.txt starts with "Apache Solr Version 1.3-dev"... should be
1.3.0 or 1.3
It looks like all of the "client" directory is now included...
including "python" which we don't even know works with trunk. Also,
should "ruby" be included and is it in shape to do so (I assume Erik
or Koji would need to verify that part of the release), and does it's
release structure look OK (not too much or too little included, etc)?
-Yonik
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Grant Ingersoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is available at http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/solr/1.3-RC2/
I've included the signatures this time. If you want to download
the whole
directory, you can get solr.tar
As always, let me know any issues, etc. Later today I will let
solr-user
know about RC2.
-Grant
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
